How to reference

If results of the FAIR 2.0 demo model are used in (non-scientific) reports/ publications or presentations, the FAIR-team requests that the publication include the statement:

For reports/ publications: Source: FAIR 2.0-demo model (den Elzen and Lucas, 2003). Own calculations.
For presentations: Source: FAIR 2.0-demo model (www.pbl.nl/fair). Own calculations.

Furthermore, the sources of the relevant scientific model components should be acknowledged in the usual way. The publications currently best describing the FAIR components are briefly described below:

References climate model:

Den Elzen, M.G.J., Schaeffer, M., and Eickhout, B., 2002. Responsibility for past and future global warming: time horizon and non-linearities in the climate system. RIVM Report no. 728001022, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

References emission allocation model:

Multi-Stage and Per capita Convergence

Den Elzen, M.G.J., 2002. Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of future commitments to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations. Integrated Assessment 3(4): 343-359.
Berk, M.M., and Den Elzen, M.G.J., 2001. Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals. Climate Policy, 1: 465-480

Simplified Multi-stage:

Den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M. and Lucas, P., Simplified Multi-Stage and Per Capita Convergence: an analysis of two climate regimes for differentiation of commitments, 2004. RIVM report 728001027, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., Lucas, P. and Van Vuuren, D.P., 2004. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy, forthcoming.

Brazilian Proposal:

Den Elzen, M.G.J., Schaeffer, M. and Lucas, P., 2004. Differentiation of future commitments based on Parties' contribution to climate change. Climate Change: uncertainties in the ‘Brazilian Proposal’ in the context of a policy implementation. Climatic Change, forthcoming.
Den Elzen, M.G.J. and Berk, M., How can the Parties fairly and effectively establish future obligations under long-term objectives?,2003. In: Climate policy for the 21st century: meeting the long-term challenge of global warming, ed. D. Michel Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC.

Climate attribution calculations:

Den Elzen, M.G.J. and Schaeffer, M., 2002. Responsibility for past and future global warming: uncertainties in attributing anthropogenic climate change. Climatic Change, 54: 29-73.

Emission Intensity targets approach:

Den Elzen, M.G.J. and Berk, M., How can the Parties fairly and effectively establish future obligations under long-term objectives?,2003. In: Climate policy for the 21st century: meeting the long-term challenge of global warming, ed. D. Michel Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC.

Global Compromise:

Den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B. and Van Vuuren, D.P. van, 2003. Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target. RIVM report 728001023, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

References mitigation cost and emissions trade model:

Den Elzen, M.G.J. and Both, S., 2002. Modelling emissions trading and abatement costs in FAIR 1.1 - Case study: the Bonn Agreement and Marrakesh Accords. RIVM report 728001021, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Den Elzen, M.G.J., Lucas, P. and Van Vuuren, D.P., 2004. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy, forthcoming.