|
|
MNP References
MNP References - Emission-allocation Model
| Type | Date | Author, year, title, source |
|---|
A | 200803011 March 2008 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Hohne N ; Moltmann S ; (2008). The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation . Energy Policy 2008; 36(3):1107-1124
| | A | 2007071919 July 2007 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Hoehne N ; Brouns B ; Winkler H ; Ott HE (2007). Differentiation of countries' future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime: an assessment of the "South-North dialogue" Proposal. Environ Sci Policy 2007; 10(3):185-203
| | A | 200603011 March 2006 |
Den Elzen MGJ; Berk M ; Lucas P ; Criqui P ; Kitous A (2006). Multi-Stage: A Rule-Based Evolution of Future Commitments under the Climate Change Convention . International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6: 1-28.
| | A | 2005101818 October 2005 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Lucas PL (2005). The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments. Environ Model Assess 2005; 10(2):115-34
| | A | 2005092828 September 2005 |
Den Elzen, M.G.J., Schaeffer, M. and Lucas, P. (2005). Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries' relative historical responsibility for climate change: uncertainties in the 'Brazilian Proposal' in the context of a policy implementation. Climatic Change, 2003, 71(3): 267-411
| | A | 2005092626 September 2005 |
den Elzen, M.G.J., Fuglestvedt, J., Höhne, N., Trudinger, C., Lowe, J., Matthews, B., Romstad, B., Pires de Campos, C., Andronova, N. (2005). Analysing countries’ contribution to climate change: scientific and policy-related choices. Environmental Science & Policy 8 (2005) 614–636
| | A | 200501011 January 2005 |
Den Elzen, M.G.J., Lucas, P. and Van Vuuren, D.P. (2005). Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. . Energy Policy, 33-16: 2138-2151.
| | A | 2004012323 January 2004 |
Elzen M den ; Berk M (2004). How can the parties fairly and effectively establish future obligations under long-term climate objectives?. In: Michel D, ed. Climate policy for the 21st century. Meeting the long-term challenge of global warming. Washington: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2003;113-52
| R | 200312011 December 2003 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Lucas P (2003). FAIR 2.0 - A decision-support tool to assess the environmental and economic consequences of future climate regimes. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
| | R | 2003112828 November 2003 |
Elzen den MGJ ; Berk MM ; Lucas P ; Eickhout B ; Vuuren van DP (2003). Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
| | A | 200212011 December 2002 |
Elzen MGJ den (2002). Exploring Climate Regimes for Differentiation of Future Commitments to Stabilise Greenhouse Gas Concentrations . Integrated Assessment Volume 3, Issue4 343 - 359
| | R | 2001031919 March 2001 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Berk MM ; Both S ; Faber A ; Oostenrijk R (2001). FAIR 1.0 (Framework to Assess International Regimes for differentiation of commitments): An interactive model to explore options for differentiation of future commitments in international climate policy making. User documentation. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
| | R | 1999073030 July 1999 |
Elzen MGJ den ; Berk M ; Schaeffer M ; Olivier J ; Hendriks C ; Metz B (1999). The Brazilian Proposal and other Options for International Burden Sharing: an evaluation of methodological and policy aspects using the FAIR model. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
