Components of IMAGE 2.4
IMAGE components and the new elements in IMAGE 2.4.
ComponentsBase year, scale and spatial resolution.The temporal scale in IMAGE 2.4 is year-based (as for all other model components), although climate parameters (precipitation and temperature) are generated on a monthly basis through pattern scaling. The number of world regions has been extended from 17 to 24 (plus Greenland and Antarctica) (and to 26 in the TIMER model) to reduce scale problems occurring in previous IMAGE versions. Historical data for the 1765-2000 period are used to initialise the carbon cycle and climate system, while data for 1970-2000 are used to calibrate the energy system (TIMER model) and the agricultural system. IMAGE 2.4 simulations generally cover the 1970-2050 period and for climate scenarios, often the period 1970-2100. Simulations are made on the basis of scenario assumptions on, for example, demography, food and energy consumption and technology and trade. Although IMAGE 2.4 is global in application, it performs many of its calculations either on a high-resolution terrestrial 0.5 by 0.5 degree grid (land use and land cover and associated emissions) or for the 24 world regions in IMAGE 2.4 (energy, trade and emissions). Economy and demographicsThe exogenous source for macro-economic drivers depends on the study in which IMAGE 2.4 is applied. Population projections are taken primarily from authoritative exogenous sources such as the UN or IIASA, but may also be adopted from the in-house demographic model, PHOENIX (Hilderink, 2001).
Energy demand and supplyIn the TIMER model, aggregated economic indicators like GDP, household consumption and value added in industry, services and agriculture are used to estimate the demand for energy services. Energy supply chains with substantial technological detail are then selected on the basis of relative costs for meeting the resulting final energy demand after autonomous and price-induced energy savings. Market shares for energy resources and technologies are calculated via a multinomial logit distribution function (de Vries et al., 2001). TIMER includes explicit treatment of traditional biofuels, vintages of capital stock, learning-by-doing (i.e. technologies improve as their installed capacity is build-up) and resource depletion (driving up costs for extraction of exhaustible energy resources). It generates primary and final energy consumption by energy type, sector and region; capacity build-up and utilisation; cost indicators, and greenhouse gas and other emissions.
Agricultural demand and tradeThe agricultural demand model of IMAGE 2.2 has been replaced by a coupling to the global trade analysis project (GTAP) model.
Land useOne of the most striking parts of IMAGE 2.4 is the geographically explicit land-use modelling, considering both cropping and livestock systems on the basis of agricultural demand and demand for energy crops. The rule-based allocation accounts for crop productivity (Agro-Ecological Zones approach; (FAO, 1978-1981), and other suitability factors like proximity to existing agricultural land and water bodies. Changes in natural vegetation cover on undisturbed or abandoned land are simulated in IMAGE 2.4 on the basis of a static natural vegetation model (Prentice et al., 1992).
Carbon cycleThe consequences of these land-use and land-cover changes for the carbon cycle are simulated by a geographically explicit terrestrial carbon cycle model. If agricultural land is abandoned, it is assumed to revert gradually to its more natural state, with implications for the carbon stock. The carbon cycle model, implemented in the IMAGE framework since version 2.0, has been subjected to a thorough evaluation, which showed that the model is suitable for simulating global and regional carbon pools and fluxes. The model accounts for important feedback mechanisms related to changing climate, CO2 concentrations and land use.
Nitrogen cycleIn contrast to IMAGE 2.4, IMAGE 2.2 and 2.3 did not include tools to assess the impact of ever-increasing nutrient loads in agricultural systems and aquatic ecosystems.
Atmosphere-Ocean systemEmissions from the energy system and emissions due to land-use changes determine the composition of the atmosphere. IMAGE 2.4 uses the Atmosphere–Ocean System model developed for IMAGE 2.2. Not strictly coupled modulesBiodiversityIn addition to these environmental impacts of global change calculated within the core biophysical modules, results are also used as input to drive impact models in the broader IMAGE 2.4 framework such as the biodiversity model, GLOBIO 3. GLOBIO can be used to assess the impacts of climate and land-use change, infrastructure and nitrogen deposition on biodiversity and ecosystems. Likely effects of scenario assumptions or political interventions are estimated by calculating trends in mean species abundance. Climate policiesIMAGE results are also used for the evaluation of climate policies in conjunction with the policy decision-support model FAIR . FAIR is widely used to assess the environmental and abatement cost implications of international regimes for the differentiation of future emission reductions of greenhouse gases. The model links long-term climate targets and global reduction objectives with regional emission allowances and abatement costs, accounting for the Kyoto Mechanisms. ReferencesBouwman AF ; Kram T ; Klein Goldewijk K (eds) (2006). Integrated modelling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Hilderink, HBM, 2000. World population in transition : an integrated regional modelling framework. Amsterdam, Thela Thesis / Rozenberg.
De Vries B, Van Vuuren D, Den Elzen M, Janssen M, 2001. The Targets Image Energy Regional (TIMER) Model. Technical Documentation, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP). Report no. 461502024 Agro-Ecological Zones approach. FAO, 1978-1981 Prentice I.C., Cramer W., Harrison S.P.,Leemans R., Monserud R.A. and Solomon A.M. (1992) A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19:177-134. |







