Shortread in 10 minutes
A good example of how these extreme events are changing is the shift in the frequency and level of daily maximum temperatures. The curve shows the projected occurrence of daily maximum temperatures and is shaped like a bell.
Over time, the bell curve shows a shift towards higher temperatures and it changes in shape. We see this already in the data between 1950 and 2020.
This curve will continue to change in the future. The annual mean temperature is rising and, more importantly, the likelihood of extremely hot temperatures is increasing rapidly.
Tens of millions of people are affected by water-related disasters, such as flooding, heavy rains, storms and drought.
Millions of people die every year because of polluted water and a lack of adequate sanitation.
The annual economic damage from extreme weather events runs in the tens of billions of US dollars.
The urgency to take action is high and, more than ever, water and climate adaptation should be at the top of all agendas, from local to global and from public to private levels.
We all live in a river basin. River systems connect all landscapes through water and sediment flows, from their sources in the mountains down to the deltas and the sea.
Drylands — the global regions where fresh water is scarce — make up 40% of the earth's surface.
Deltas and coastal zones are at the interface where river dynamics — water and sediment flows, and their nutrients — meet the dynamics of the sea.
Cities — all these landscapes are home to large parts of the global population living in urbanised areas.
Water and climate-related challenges manifest in four types of issues: too little, too much and too dirty water, and impacts on biodiversity.
We can identify many factors that indicate whether these issues are worsening or improving over time. Assessment of the projected future changes in these indicators will reveal the fingerprint of these changes.
For instance: water withdrawal from surface and groundwater resources is an indicator related to too little water. Under a business-as-usual scenario, withdrawal will continue to increase in support of increased crop production.
Under a high ambition pathway, water use — and thus water withdrawal from surface and groundwater resources — can be reduced while crop yields are increased as a result of more efficient irrigation.
We assessed the projected changes between 2020 and 2070 for 28 indicators across the four hotspot landscapes.
Hotspot Landscape 1
Drylands
There is good news for the drylands: the indicators of too little water show improvement, illustrating that we are able to produce more food using less water, partly thanks to a higher efficiency of irrigation. Improved water management and crop production also reduces conflict risk related to water stress.
Hotspot Landscape 2
River Basins
Little improvement is projected for biodiversity. Already today, the ecological quality of our rivers is under great pressure. This is largely due to dams, constructed since the middle of the previous century, and the high loads of nutrients from agricultural fields and discharges from households and industries.
Hotspot Landscape 3
Deltas and Coasts
For deltas and coastal zones, the improvement regarding the indicator of too much water illustrates the strong reduction in the population exposed to flooding under a high ambition pathway, compared with a business-as-usual scenario. This reduction results especially from investments in dykes and levees, and zoning restrictions for urban development in flood-prone coastal zones.
Little change is projected for the indicator of too dirty water; high loads of nutrients to coastal seas remain high, even under a high ambition pathway.
Hotspot Landscape 4
Cities
These high loads of nutrients are partly related to the cities; bending the trend of nutrient emissions from households and industries continues to be a challenge. However, there is a lot of perspective to improve wastewater treatment, sanitation, and sewerage connections.
Compared with the projected changes in the other indicators, those in flooding-related economic risk are extremely high. This reflects the continuing growth in population and GDP, and the ongoing urbanisation along rivers and in deltas and coastal zones. Urban damage caused by flooding can however be reduced under various ambition pathways, compared with the business-as-usual scenario.
A stepwise increase in the ambition level for future pathways, from low to moderate and high, gradually decreases the number of indicators that show substantial deterioration, compared with the situation for 2020.
The percentage of assessed indicators that show more than 5% improvement increases from about 25% under the business-as-usual scenario to about 75% under the high ambition pathway.
Improvements are particularly strong for indicators related to issues of too little and too dirty water. Clearly, under the high ambition level, there is a lot of perspective to improve water use efficiency, food production and the conditions for water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), and reduce water stress and related conflict risk.
Projected future developments at the global scale are not the same for each region. The business-as-usual scenario shows a further deterioration for most indicators between 2020 and 2070, especially in Africa and Southeast Asia. The indicator scores are positive for China, illustrating the positive effect of population decline.
The strong improvement under the high ambition pathway for the global picture is reflected in all regions. Sub-Saharan Africa, however, is clearly lagging behind; ongoing strong population growth and low economic growth continue to put a lot of stress on freshwater supply and sanitation in Africa.
There are 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and water is linked to all of them. For many of them this link is strong, for some it is indirect.
Under the business-as-usual scenario, a deterioration is projected for most of these Sustainable Development Goals.
A high ambition approach to tackle the water- and climate-related challenges can contribute in many ways to achieving the SDGs and thus to sustainable development; our high ambition pathway shows substantially more co-benefits for the SDGs than the business-as-usual scenario.
A wicked problem rises with respect to the construction of large hydropower dams. On the one hand, dams contribute to the production of renewable energy (SDG 7), but lead to displacement of local communities and disruption water and sediment flows, fish migration and sediment supply to downstream deltas and coasts, on the other.
The business-a-usual scenario shows that current value systems, practices and policies structurally overlook the essential role of water.
Much can be achieved under a high ambition pathway, but regional differences are large.
1. We need to increase the level of urgency:
Secretary General Antonio Guterres: ‘Water needs to be at the centre of the global political agenda.’
2. We need to innovate our approaches to water-related challenges:
Global Commission on the Economics of Water: ‘We must take actions that are bolder, more integrated, across sectors, and more networked at national, regional and global levels.’
3. We need to improve governance at the global scale:
World Resources Institute: ‘We need a Paris Agreement-like treaty for water to address water resource management, sanitation, adaptation and mitigation, and transboundary cooperation, globally and regionally.’
Developed countries have agreed to make USD 100 billion a year available to developing countries, so that they can take measures to mitigate global warming and adapt to the impacts of climate change.
In 2020, these countries had not fully honoured that agreement.
Moreover, the developed countries had only allocated a small part of their financial aid for adaptation to the changing climate ...
... while we already know that this will require much more money, up to hundreds of billions of US dollars per year, by 2050.
Rising to the challenges requires a transition towards radically different, water-based policies and practices, and strengthening of the governance on all levels, from local to global.
The water sector cannot do it alone.
Final thought
‘Climate change is largely due to the greenhouse gas emissions of high-income countries, whereas low-income countries seem to be bearing most of the consequences, overstretching their adaptation capacities.’
This Shortread is part of the following series:
Part II: The Geography of Future Water Challenges - Bending the Trend
Book and Policy Summary
Navigating Rivers and Deltas towards a Sustainable Future